U.S. national debate topic, 2015-2016. Surveillance (The Reference Shelf)



Publisher: Grey House Publishing

Written in English
Cover of: U.S. national debate topic, 2015-2016. Surveillance (The Reference Shelf) |
Published: Downloads: 58
Share This
The Physical Object
FormatPaperback
Paginationxi, 185 pages
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL25761159M
ISBN 109781619256927

Policy debate is a form of debate competition in which teams of two advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate (sometimes shortened to Cross-X, CX, Cross-ex, or C-X) because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech.   The US has frequently invoked national security as a justification for policies that violate international law. These include the torture of detainees in the US “war on terror,” secretive.   The 20 member West Point Debate Society was founded in the early 's and is overseen by Major Adam Scher, an assistant professor in the Department of Social Society competes in tournaments a semester including regional and national tournaments of the Cross Examination Debate West Point created the National Debate Tournament, which .   A clip of a video statement made for the debate by former National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden was shown. Panelists debated the topic of government surveillance.

  On June 5, the anniversary of the first Snowden disclosures, Governance Studies at Brookings held a debate on the future of U.S. intelligence collection authorities. The resolution was "U.S.   The author of a new book on the privacy/security debate identifies five false arguments that erode personal freedom By Daniel J. Solove PM (UTC).   Senators debated the U.S.A. Freedom Act, which would end the bulk collection of Americans' phone records by the December 9, Year in Review, NSA Surveillance.   In the latest Intelligence Squared debate, John Yoo and other legal scholars faced off over the constitutionality of the National Security Agency's phone surveillance program.

National Security, Mass Surveillance, and Citizen Rights under Conditions of Protracted Warfare When the Snowden revelations and the issue of electronic mass surveillance became a hot topic of debate, my inquiries around personal privacy then evolved into an Growth of U.S. Surveillance . While the country was embroiled in a national debate over excessive government surveillance in , President Gerald Ford authorized the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct warrantless. For the United States, tensions are rising with both allies and adversaries. Rogue states are racing to master new technologies and create weapons of mass destruction, and faith in international institutions is seemingly deteriorating. What does this all mean for U.S. national security? Time for a Rigorous National Debate About Surveillance Post-9/11 measures have been weakened or discarded. A coherent new approach is needed.

U.S. national debate topic, 2015-2016. Surveillance (The Reference Shelf) Download PDF EPUB FB2

Reference Shelf: National Debate Topic Surveillance Paperback – J by Hw Wilson (Editor) See all 2 formats and editions Hide other formats and editions. Price New from Used from Paperback "Please retry" $ $ $ Paperback $ 10 Format: Paperback.

US national debate topic, Surveillance United States national debate topic, Surveillance Surveillance Series The reference shelf ; vol number 3 Note Series previously published by H. Wilson, a division of EBSCO Information Services. ISBN (paperback: v. 87, no. 3) (paperback: v. 87, no. US national debate topic, Surveillance United States national debate topic, Surveillance Uniform series Reference shelf v.

87, no. Notes Series previously published by H. Wilson, a division of EBSCO Information Services. "Websites": pages   Get this from a library. U.S. national debate topic, Surveillance.

[H.W. Wilson Company.;] -- This volume examines the National Forensic League's /16 Policy Debate, which answers the question: "Should the United States substantially curtail domestic surveillance?" From Edward Snowden's.

Curtain Its Domestic Surveillance NATIONAL DEBATE TOPIC FOR HIGH SCHOOLS, – Pursuant to 44 United States Code, Section Compiled by the Congressional Research Service Library of Congress U.S.

Government Publishing Office Washington, DC File Size: 1MB. Surveillance examines the National Forensic League's /16 Policy Debate, which answers the question: "Should the United States substantially curtail domestic surveillance?".

From Edward Snowden's controversial NSA leaks to ongoing arguments regarding domestic surveillance drones and police body cameras, the topic of government surveillance on U.S.

citizens is thoroughly explored in. Get this from a library. Resolved, the United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance: national debate topic for high schools, pursuant to 44 United States Code, section [Library of Congress.

Congressional Research Service,;]. Resolved, the United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance: national debate topic for high schools, pursuant to U.S.

national debate topic United States Code, section / compiled by the Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Format Microfiche Book.

APA Citation (style guide) (). U.S. national debate topic, Ipswich, Massachusetts: Amenia, NY: H. Wilson, a division of EBSCO Information Services. The National Speech & Debate Association sets monthly and bi-monthly topics for a variety of debate events.

Find current topics, voting links, resources, and more. The NSA should end its surveillance of U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents. National Speech & Debate Tournament – On balance, a one-day national. Similar Items. Resolved, the United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance: national debate topic for high schools, pursuant to 44 United States Code, section / Published: () Resolved, the United States federal government should substantially increase its non-military exploration and/or development of the Earth's oceans: national.

FOR Government Surveillance: AGAINST Government Surveillance: 1. WE NEED TO BE KEPT SAFE. We should not be naïve: the world is not a safe place. Terrorist organisations such as the so-called Islamic State aim to cause massive loss of life, and they’re not restrained by.

The Congressional Research Service has produced a bibliography on domestic surveillance to support this year’s national high school debate program which is devoted to that subject. “Resolved: The United States Federal Government Should Substantially Curtail Its Domestic Surveillance” is the topic that was selected for the high school debate by representatives of the National.

The National Speech & Debate Association is the world’s largest honor society devoted to speech and debate activities, and bestows numerous awards and recognition to students, coaches, and schools.

We also host the largest academic competition in the world, the National Speech & Debate Tournament. Resolved, the United States federal government should substantially curtail its domestic surveillance: national debate topic for high schools, National debate topic for high schools, Series Senate document / th Congress, 1st session.

Place a Hold — We Know All About You, Book by Jeffreys-Jones, Rhodri U.S. National Debate Topic, U.S. National Debate Topic,Book Surveillance Book - The U.S.

National Debate Topic, Education Reform. Education Reform is the focus of the National Forensics League’s Policy Debate. Articles discuss different strategies in reforming primary and secondary education in the U.S. LGBTQ in the 21st Century.

So the debate about the mass collection of data on populations, the links between the state, the intelligence services and large corporations, and the uses and limits of oversight can continue.

NPR coverage of national news, U.S. politics, elections, business, arts, culture, health and science, and technology. Subscribe to the NPR Nation RSS feed. If you have surveillance in abundance, this will make people uneasy, and make them feel like the government is holding too much power.

In the past, when England controlled the colonies, the colonies broke away and tried their best not to give the federal government too. His decision to turn from obscure IC wonk to whistleblower in set off a national debate about the extent of government surveillance by intelligence agencies desperate to avoid a repeat of the.

With the rise of modern technologies, the scope and scale of government surveillance has exploded. The use of digital communication has made communication more efficient, but also much more vulnerable. Governments, meanwhile, are increasing their capacity to exploit these vulnerabilities, and companies, their ability to thwart them.

Both the PATRIOT act and the Snowden. National Debate Resolutions its authority either to detain without charge or to search without probable cause. Resolved: The United States federal government should establish a policy substantially increasing the number of persons serving in one or more of the following national service programs: AmeriCorps, Citizen Corps, Senior Corps.

The Reference Shelf: U.S. National Debate Topic – Surveillance The Reference Shelf: U.S. National Debate Topic U.S.-China Relations The Reference Shelf: U.S.

National Debate Topic Education Reform. Congress should not go back to a pre-9/11 set of rules just to appeal to populist sentiment. Congress and the White House have an obligation to protect our liberties and to safeguard our security--in equal measure." Domestic surveillance therefore has real impacts on preventing terrorist attacks within a nation like the U.S.

Americans today vacillate over national security and government power. We want an effective intelligence community, but we don’t want too much surveillance. Resolved, the United States federal government should substantially curtain its domestic surveillance: national debate topic for high schools, pursuant to 44 United States Code, section / Published: ().

Civil Liberties vs National Security Debate: Where Do You Stand. Leaking 41 slides and a four-page court order has led to one of most hotly contested debates in recent memory. As President Obama pointed out, “you can’t have a percent security, and also then have.

Data privacy compliance and national security seem to be in opposition—with one coming at the expense of the other. It’s time to instead focus the conversation on identifying opportunities for the private sector and government to collaborate.

On Wednesday, USA Today hosted the first and only vice presidential debate of the election cycle, moderated by Susan Page. We’ve combed through the transcript from the debate to present the national security-related exchanges. These excerpts are organized both thematically and chronologically.

A complete transcript is available from USA Today here. Big military = no national security problems. Got it. Of course, as Lawfare’s helpful national security-focused transcript of last week’s debate underscores, some of the folks currently seeking the Republican nomination have said more (and more thoughtful) things on the subject, especially Senators Graham and Paul.

But even they have. The book by the man whose leaks of classified documents transformed the debate about government surveillance is coming out September Metropolitan Books, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers, announced Thursday that Snowden’s “Permanent Record” will be released simultaneously in more than 20 countries, including the U.S., Germany and.

A Real Debate on Surveillance. he can order his intelligence directors to explain to the public precisely how the National Security Agency’s widespread collection of domestic telephone data.